Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±³Á¤¿ë ¹Ì´Ï½ºÅ©·ùÀÇ µðÀÚÀΰú ÇÇÁú°ñÀÇ µÎ²²¿¡ µû¸¥ ¿ªÇÐÀû ¾ÈÁ¤¼º Æò°¡

MINISCREW STABILITY REGARDING DESIGN OF MINISCREW AND THICKNESS OF CORTICAL BONE

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 2011³â 38±Ç 3È£ p.250 ~ 259
±Ç¿µ¼±, ÇöÈ«±Ù, ±è¿µÀç, ±èÁ¤¿í,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±Ç¿µ¼± ( Kweon Young-sun ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
ÇöÈ«±Ù ( Hyun Hong-Keun ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
±è¿µÀç ( Kim Young-Jae ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
±èÁ¤¿í ( Kim Jung-Wook ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ¼Ò¾Æ û¼Ò³âÀÇ ¾ãÀº ÇÇÁú°ñ¿¡¼­ ¾ÈÁ¤¼ºÀ» °¡Áö´Â ¹Ì´Ï½ºÅ©·ù µðÀÚÀÎÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. Á÷°æ, ±æÀÌ, ¸öü¸ð¾çÀ» ´Þ¸®ÇÑ ±³Á¤¿ë ¹Ì´Ï½ºÅ©·ù¸¦ ÇÇÁú°ñÀÇ µÎ²²¸¦ ´Þ¸®ÇÑ µÎ Á¾·ùÀÇ ÀÎÁ¶°ñ ½ÃÆí¿¡ ½Ä¸³ÇÏ¿© ÃÖ´ë ½Ä¸³ ÅäÅ©, ÃÖ´ë Á¦°Å ÅäÅ© ¹× Ãø¹æ º¯À§ ÅäÅ©¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸°á°ú ÇÇÁú°ñÀÇ µÎ²² ¹× ¹Ì´Ï½ºÅ©·ùÀÇ Á÷°æ, ±æÀÌ, ¸öü¸ð¾çÀº ¸ðµÎ ÃÖ´ë ½Ä¸³ ÅäÅ©, ÃÖ´ë Á¦°Å ÅäÅ©, Ãø¹æ º¯À§ ÅäÅ©¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇÑ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÃÆ´Ù. ÇÇÁú°ñÀÇ µÎ²²°¡ °¡Àå Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ä¼Ò·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç ¿øÃßÇüÀÌ ¿øÅëÇüº¸´Ù Ãʱ⠰íÁ¤·ÂÀÌ ¿ì¼öÇÏ°í, Á÷°æÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÒ¼ö·Ï ¿ªÇÐÀû °íÁ¤·Â È®º¸¿¡ À¯¸®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±æÀÌÀÇ Áõ°¡´Â ´Ù¸¥ ¿ä¼Ò¿¡ ºñÇØ Ãʱ⠰íÁ¤·Â È®º¸¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀÌ Å©Áö ¾ÊÀ¸³ª 6 mm¿Í 8 mm´Â °íÁ¤·Â È®º¸¿¡ Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù(p<0.05). ÇÇÁú°ñÀÌ ¾ãÀº ¼Ò¾Æ û¼Ò³âÀÇ °ñ¿¡¼­ ¹Ì´Ï½ºÅ©·ùÀÇ ¾ÈÁ¤¼ºÀº ¿øÃßÇü, Á÷°æ 1.8 mm°¡ À¯¸®Çϸç, ±æÀ̵µ 6 mm º¸´Ù´Â 8 mm°¡ À¯¸®ÇÏ´Ù.

The aim of this study was to suggest a design for an orthodontic miniscrew which may work most favorably in the thin cortical bone of the adolescent. In this study, orthodontic miniscrews with different diameters, lengths, and body types were manufactured and implanted in two artificial bone samples with different cortical bone thickness. Maximum insertion torque, maximum removal torque, and lateral alteration torque were measured. As a result, the bone quality, body type, diameter, and the length all had their effects on the maximum insertion torque, maximum removal torque, and lateral alteration torque. Cortical bone thickness was the most important factor. In initial stability, conical types showed better results than cylindrical types. Increase in the diameter had favorable effects in achieving mechanical stability. Increase in the length did not have as much influence as the other factors did on the initial stability, but there was a statistically significant difference between screws of 6 mm and 8 mm lengths(p<0.05). In conclusion, the conical type screw with a diameter of 1.8 mm is most favorable in the thin cortical bone of the adolescent. In terms of length, the 8 mm screw is expected to perform better than the 6 mm screw.

Å°¿öµå

±³Á¤¿ë ¹Ì´Ï½ºÅ©·ù; °ñÁú; Á÷°æ; ±æÀÌ; ¸öü¸ð¾ç
Orthodontic miniscrew; Cortical bone thickness; Diameter; Length; Body type

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI